Showing posts with label Black Liberation Theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Black Liberation Theology. Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2020

BLM Revolution; but if you want money for minds that hate...

First let me say you are most likely not a white supremacist, neither are you likely a racist (your would likely know if you were). Both these have caused a problem for those that make a living maintaining Black victim-hood status. So these race baiters have declared whites are born racist, main stream America is systemically racist, so the only answer is to "defund" police department so they are free to end the American experiment of self rule through rioting and wide unabated criminal activity to frighten the American citizenry in to allowing them to put in it's place an oppressive Marxist regime.   

In Seattle they are now teaching white participants that  "objectivity," "individualism," "intellectualization," and "comfort" are all vestiges of internalized racial oppression. To “let go” of “comfort,” “guaranteed physical safety,” “control over the land,” “social status,” and “relationships with some other white people.” In other words, to expunge your internal racism you must never use discernment, you must never think for yourself (to think for yourself is the ultimate crime against Marxism) or intellectualize anything, or even have white friends. Further they say that wanting to feel comfort and being safety in your home means you are a white supremacist. This is ridiculously absurd but it does fall in line with classic Marxist indoctrination. Just like Winston Smith in 1984, victory for BLM Marxism is to breakdown a persons will and psyche, so they accept everything told to them by the powers that be,  especially if it is not grounded in truth or reality; the more ridiculous the better. The only thing that matters to Marxist is total control of the individual; hence the term totalitarian.  And it doesn't matter, what any white person does to be accountable to BLM, it will never be acceptable or enough. (Let me repeat this so it's perfectly clear, there is no way a white person can redeem themselves to BLM, any action or actions will always be seen as futile because collectivism needs an unrepentant enemy of the people to take hold). It would be no different than a sociopathic killer telling their victim they can beg for their lives if they want to; you are expected expected to beg for forgiveness, even though you know it will fail. And you will gladly do it because it is a mandate of the Marxist moral state which you should joyfully follow.

In the Black community you often hear about who is down for the struggle and who is an Uncle Tom for being successful by joining main stream America; the truth is that in today's main stream America blacks are welcomed with open arms . But what becomes very obvious is there is simply no path to success if you follow the down for the struggle credo. White Privilege is just another excuse in a long list of excuses why Blacks have not succeeded. The major flaw in this excuse is the blacks that do join main stream America tend to be very successful; you know the Uncle Toms, and while Blacks do experience some racism, it certainly is not pervasive or systematic. Many Blacks that live in Democrat ghettos, have Black mayors, Black police chiefs, Black assembly and council members and Black business owners. And since many Blacks in the ghettos refuse to leave the ghettos (being down with the struggle) and join what they call white main stream America. So White Privilege becomes more about something they hear about, as they rarely place themselves in a situation where, if White Privilege existed,  they would experience it.  The reason Blacks live in such poverty, in city ghettos with rampant crime, poor education, violent street gangs and broken families is because they have voted and relied on Democrats for the last 50 years. So the issues facing the Black community is not White Privilege, is is Democrat neglect.

The very belief that a single race shares a single belief is a racist (and absurd) unto itself. But such a belief system goes hand and hand with the Democrat racist worldview of identity politics, that professes all races have only one collective world view. This is s form of reverse Eugenics (Eugenics a form of rabid white supremacy embraced by Democrats in the late 19th century, that was praised by Planned Parenthood's Margarete Sanger and Hitler himself), that has been spelled out by Black Liberation Theology, embraced the rabidly antisemitic Louis Farrakhan, and President Obama's long time mentor, Rev Jeremiah Wright.  Therefore, BLM and the Democrats have seemingly aligned themselves with such an identity racist worldview, that one race is responsible for all the unfairness in the world.

As I pointed out before, Black Lives Matter is not a civil rights group, they are a hate group with a political agenda. The fact that thousands of young  men are being murdered is not their concern; their name notwithstanding. Their sole propose is to disrupt the country to make way for a Marxist regime. Their new catch word is white supremacy; 250 years since the Declaration of Independence, and 165 years after 600,000 Americans died in a civil war to end slavery, and 4 years since the first black President was elected, but now BLM decides the founding fathers were white supremacists, as are all whites today; and denying you are a white supremacist is absolute proof you are a white supremacist (This is truly a conundrum, since BLM tells us all whites are white supremacists, how can one be more of a white supremacists if they deny they are?) Of course none of this is supposed to make any sense anyway.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Individualism vs The Collective Part #1 "The Teachings of Jesus"


After returning from the Religious Educational Congress in Anaheim, I was reminded of several years ago when I heard Jim Wallis, the great apologist for Pol Pot’s massacre of a million Cambodians (Marxism for Christianity; Jim Wallis, Running With the Devil) and also an apologist for President Obama’s lack of a true Christian faith. Jim Wallis’ Sojourners and Jeremiah Wright’s Black Liberation Theology are two good examples of Liberal Christian Organizations that are co-opting Christianity for their political purposes (a truer meaning of “using the Lord’s name in vain” is using God for your own selfish purposes, not necessarily cursing). In this liberals using Christianity to spread communism. Listening to Jim Wallis he will tell you that Jesus was a Socialist; the truth is Christianity and Socialism are mutual exclusive.
Throughout history dictators and kings have used the concepts of collectivism to control the masses. Then as in now, the leaders cared not for the welfare on any one individual, but the health of the peasants or workers as a whole; for from the peasants/workers came the armies that would be needed and the food grown by the collective farmers needed to feed them. Then along came Jesus and Christianity, where for the first time the individual was the most important the collective non-existent. President Obama has discussed the need for “Collective Salvation”, a belief system advocated by Jeremiah Wright and his Black Liberation Theology. Here we have an almost perfect parallel with the Bible and Paul’s letter to the Corinthians. The infant church was being corrupted as teachers added complexity, new rules and necessary deeds to earn ones salvation. The pillar of Christianity rests on John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. In other words one is saved, by the grace of God, from eternal punishment for sin which is granted to those who accept by faith God’s conditions of repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus. More simply put, salvation is gods gift to the world as no amount of deeds could free the world from sin; this is what is referred to in Christianity as “God’s Grace”.
In Christianity, redemption (the paying of a debt) was Jesus’ death on the cross that paid for the sins of the world. However Jeremiah Wright has other ideas. Black Liberation Theology teaches that the white race must redeem themselves for the past oppression of blacks; apparently the sacrifice of Jesus was not enough and the white race will still have to pay off the black race to reach salvation. This best described in Galations 1:7-10 Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse. Am I now trying to win the approval of human beings, or of God? Or am I trying to please people? If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a servant of Christ.
Jesus never spoke of collective salvation or collective redemption; in fact it was the complete opposite. Jesus spurned the idea of the collective, in the name of a personnel savior. The health of the collective was not a concern of Jesus, nor was one’s station in life or economic status; in the Lord’s Prayer we pledge to “Forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors” (apparently Jeremiah Wright would want to interject an asterisk in the forgiveness part). And of course what is either purposely distorted or lost with Liberal Christian Organizations, is that giving is for the sake of the giver, not the receiver. While Jesus repeatedly directed his followers to feed the poor (and the poor certainly benefited), it was for the sake of the givers repentance (the act of changing your ways to God’s ways) and individual salvation, that Jesus wants us to give; as Jesus said in Matthew 26:11 The poor you will always have with you, but you will not always have me.
Liberal Christian Organizations believe that communism (or socialism) would create a world according to the teachings of Christ, but the real teachings of Jesus are the bane of Liberal thinking. Jesus taught his followers since all are equal in God’s eyes, that material equality is insignificant; one should simply be the best at what ever their station of life and spend their energies helping others and loving god. To Jesus the collective had no meaning, because he was concerned about the saving the souls of individuals, not the health and/or control of the collective. I close with Jesus words in Mathew 23:13-15; words that could have been directed at Jim Wallis and Jeremiah Wright. Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men's faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to. Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, you make him twice as much a son of hell as you are.