The Democrats Triple down on Man Made Global Warming

March in Santa Cruz appears to be the evangelizing  Man Made Global Warming (MMGW) month. Just in our little town there has been a UCSC Climate Conference and  three letters in the Sentinel; plus in Washington DC a Talkathon planned by Democrats (thank you Barbara Boxer; is it any wonder that the electorate doesn't care about Global Warming, but the Democrats are shoving it down the electorates' throats rather than tackling real problems like unemployment and the national debt, or try and fix our healthcare system that ObamaCare has destroyed) and it's only the 9th!. But the electorate  has  woken up to some facts that cast doubt on this government funded dogma ;there has been no global warming in the last 17 years, which also discredits every computer model offered up by the UN.

You also have the inconvenient untruth of Al Gore's predictions, that by 2013 the polar waters would be free of ice;  nope, the ice still there and actually grew by 60% from the previous year  (I would say that it is a record amount but the Arctic ice has only been documented since 1979, so who knows if it's much of a record or not). When Gore gives his MMGW presentations he continually showed graphs that reversed the known phenomenon that when the oceans are warmed they release C02; instead his graphs shows C02 levels warming the oceans. He used to shrug it off saying is was a typo, but this typo continued to show up and now he will not debate any of his scientific rhetoric.  There is also the fact that the research papers that supported Michael Mann's hockey stick graph (which fueled the recent MMGW doomsday-sayers) seems to have disappeared (lost somewhere in my office says Mann), which is really okay, because his hockey stick graph has been completely discredited (even by Mann himself), even though he still says the science is good.

The MMGW also love to use climate and weather interchangeably, or invent new terms and theories to explain the failure of their computer models, as long as it's in their favor. Hot weather in the 90's proved global warming, cooling weather in the 2000-2014 proves Climate Change. The last glacial period was about 10-12000 years ago, so it's quite evident that the climate has gotten warmer; but the nature of the climate covers 10,000's of years, not hot or cold periods of weather that have occurred or a few hundred years. 2013 had the lowest instance of Atlantic hurricanes sine 1982, 2013 also shattered the record for fewest US tornadoes and forest fire activity plummeted to 1987 levels. There is also the 2013-2014 record cold wave that effected Canada and the Northern US (Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic coast).  Current computers say that MMGW will cause climate change, that will increase the amount of rain in California, which of course is in the middle of a drought (but that didn't stop President Obama from blaming the drought on MMGW). The drought and rain patterns for California are likely the result of repeating weather patterns refereed to as El Niño and El Niña. The current condition, El Niño historically causes higher temperatures and drought conditions, the colder and rainy weather is the result of El Niño. These two weather patterns have repeated and have been observed over time, so scientists can reasonably predict their appearance and effects on the weather.    

One of the most  the often false claim is that there is overwhelming evidence that MMGW exists. The truth is there is no evidence at all that MMGW exists; all there are is observations based on an unknown norm and computer models that churn out inaccurate predictions.The claim that C02 retains heat is the basis for MMGW is the result of the worse of proxy science; if MMGW exists then C02 is the only viable element that could account for it; in other words you first need the predisposition that there is MMGW and then claim it's the result of C02 levels. But even that isn't working out for the zealots. The levels of C02 have been increasing considerably since the beginning of the new millennium, but temperatures  have remained flat; so where is the heat that should be caused by all this C02? Well the zealots now say it's hiding somewhere in the oceans; they don't know exactly where, but they know it's there because the whole belief system of MMGW depends on it. But we are assured that the science of MMGW is settled, which makes MMGW the only settled science known to man.

What's obvious is, the planet be damned, the Democrats and other oppressive regimes have an end game of carbon taxes and control over the actions of all humanity.  Global Warming has simply morphed into a state sponsored religion with cult leaders that demand you, ignore the doubters, pay your carbon taxes or there will be another great flood.

MIT Climate Scientists Call IPCC report "Hilarious Incoherence"

With climate week coming to the UN it may be worth looking at the IPCC's new assessment on Man Made Global Warming (AGW); basically the report says it ain't happening, especially since 1998. This of course means that every climate change computer model has produced bunk. It also turns out that Arctic ice, which had been melting  at a record rate is now growing back at a record rate; 60 % in just one year! In an article in Popular Technology.net it turns out the 97% consensus on AGW  was greatly exaggerated with many of the scientists complaining that John Cook's team falsely classified their papers as "endorsing  AGW." Finally you have the commissioner of the EU policy on global warming admitting the science appears to not sustain AGW, but that the EU should follow through with it in the event it proves to be true in the future. EU, Climate Change Policy Right Even if Science Wrong This is not to say the IPCC has given up on global warming. While they admit they don't understand the recent lack of warming, they have doubled down with their computer models saying the proof of AGW is greater than ever. The lack of warming they say should be looked at with the knowledge that climate occurs over thousands of years, so a decade without warming is not that consequential. This sounds reasonable unless you realize that AGW is based on proxy science, meaning it is based on what is already known about historic climate change, which only goes back about 100 years and it was  the warming of the 1980's and 90's that was in part, the bases of the proxy science proof of AGW; in other wards the AGW proponents themselves sold AGW on the warming of a few decades. Further, the AGW proponents have locked AGW together with C02 being a heat trapping gas and therefore heating up the planet, but during the last 15 years C02 levels have increased at a rapid rate but there has been no warming.

The real issue is AGW is a political notion not really based in science. The current school of thought amongst the AGW proponents trying to explain the failure of all their computer models, is the warming air is hiding in the ocean and there are governments, including the US that castigated the IPCC for not giving enough weight to this supposition. “The U.S. also urged the authors to include the ‘leading hypothesis’ that the reduction in warming is linked to more heat being transferred to the deep ocean,” US and Europe tried to Cover Up Data Showing Lack of Global Warming The mere fact the government entites is involved in any way with a scientific report shows it is political and not scientific.

Climate scientists from MIT explain the since the previous computer models  failed to include the transfer of heat into the ocean question the validity of the extent of AGW. “However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability,” Lindzen continued. “Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified.” Top MIT Scientists say IPCC climate report hilariously flawed “I think that the latest IPCC report has truly sunk to level of hilarious incoherence,” Dr. Richard Lindzen told Climate Depot, a global warming skeptic news site. “They are proclaiming increased confidence in their models as the discrepancies between their models and observations increase.”

When a human body is shot or stabbed and a main artery is ruptured, the person will usually bleed out in 30 seconds. During the beginning of the 30 seconds the person can be alert and seemingly functional;  in other words the body is dead, but the brain doesn't know it yet.

Global Warming and the Tornado.

The tragedy of the recent tornado activity in Oklahoma City is driving the dogma of Man Made Global Warming into the media and blogs again. Regardless of the changing of the name to Climate Change, these theories still rely on the un-proven belief that 1)C02 traps heat 2)the more C02 in the atmosphere, the higher the temperature. Below is a typical letter and my response. From the Santa Cruz Sentential May 21, 2013.


A review of 12,000 papers on climate change, in the May 15 issue of "Environmental Research Letters" found that 97 percent of scientists attribute climate change to human activities. Although we're unlikely to reverse climate change, we can mitigate its effects by reducing our driving, energy use, and meat consumption. Yes, meat consumption. A 2006 U.N. report estimated that meat consumption accounts for 18 percent of man-made greenhouse gases. Carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, is generated by burning forests to create animal pastures and by combustion of fossil fuels to confine, feed, transport, and slaughter animals. The much more damaging methane and nitrous oxide are discharged from digestive tracts of cattle and from animal waste cesspools, respectively. Each of us has the power to reduce the devastating effects of climate change every time we eat. Our local supermarket offers a rich variety of soy-based lunch meats, hotdogs, veggie burgers and soy and nut-based dairy products, as well as an ample selection of vegetables, fruits, grains, and nuts. Product lists, easy recipes, and transition tips are at www.livevegan.org.

Preston Daniels, Santa Cruz

My response:

First, even if you accept that "97 percent of scientists attribute climate change to human activities". 1) science by consensus is not science 2) the vast majority of the scientist contacted are not climatologist. Further C02 is at it's highest level in 100,000s of years, yet there has been no global warming in 15 years and even counting the recent tragedy in Oklahoma City (Oklahoma City lies in the lower half of tornado alley), tornado activity is at a 60 year low. Man Made Global Warming (MMGW) climate scientists are at a conundrum to explain this lack of warming and the fact that all their computer models have been wrong (regardless of what John Kerry says); the end result is new made up theories like the warm weather is hiding in the ocean (I'm not making this up). MMGW is simply a government tax scheme to control the means of world production.

 
Further I sent the following letter;

Preston Daniels' letter on Tues, May 21 touts a 97% consensus amongst scientific papers regarding global warming caused by humans (AGW) . This study was done by a AGW  zealot by the name of John Cook. This study has not only been scientifically discredited, but had become the post child for the manipulation of information.  One of the primary criticisms is most of the studies Cook claimed to support AGW, were actually neutral on the subject (8,000) or rejected it entirely (the 97% was based on a ranking system, not the actual number of studies). One researcher that critiqued the study said ,  "Remembering AGW stands for anthropogenic global warming, or global warming caused by humans, take a minute to let that sink in.  This study done by John Cook and others..., found more scientific publications whose abstracts reject global warming than say humans are primarily to blame for it".

Why Liberals Have to Lie Part 4; Class Warfare

More letters to the editor. The last, Obama Promotes Class Warfare, was published in the Sentential on 9.24.2011

The Rich Have Piles of Money

The left likes to blame the consolidation of wealth, or the rich sitting on piles of money for this recession. In a way that is true, but it’s not like you think. First, the rich do not like to sit on piles of money; they want to use their money to make more money. In the 1999 the rich were in a quandary; they had piles of money, but because Greenspan was holding interest rates so low, there was no place to invest it. Then came the American Dream Commitment Act, a progressive attempt at social engineering, which increased mortgages at such a rate, that mortgage securities became the investment dejour. Since the sub-prime meltdown, the economy continues to languish, because unlike other burst bubbles, the middle class took a direct hit. The one place where the middle class invests large sums of money and uses the equity to make other large purchases and drives a large part of the economy, has collapsed. So yes, the rich are sitting on large piles of money, because again, there is no place to invest and the current Administration continues to create more and more regulation and law, associated with the newly passed health-care and financial-reform bills.

Climate Change and the SOS

These articles on Climate Change are becoming long in the tooth (SC Sentential 9/25) . Never mind that Charles Hanley quotes some studies that have already been proven wrong, but he makes the statement that “The bases of anthropogenic- manmade global warming- has been clear for more than century, since researchers proved that carbon dioxide (CO2) traps heat.” This statement is the fraudulent basis for manmade global warming and has never, ever been proven. What has been known for more than a century is the reverse, that when world temperatures rise, the oceans emit a higher level of carbon dioxide; in other words heat increases CO2; not the other way around). The reason this has been turned around is that the only basis for CO2 trapping heat is in computer models, fudged to prove man made global warming exists and if it CO2 does not trap heat, then man made warming does not exist. And what is the answer to man made global warming? Why it’s a fascist world government with global re-distribution of wealth; seems a little harsh for a fudged computer model.

Obama Promotes Class Warfare

In President Obama’s recent speech schilling for his new American Jobs Act, he continually spoke of the rich paying their fair share. Parroting Warren Buffet, the President said a secretary should not have to pay a higher tax rate than her millionaire/billionaire boss. The problem with this statement is it is not true. In an AP article in the Sentinel by Stephen Ohlemacher he states what other fact checkers have confirmed that, “On the average, the wealthiest people in America pay a lot more taxes than the middle class or poor…They pay at a higher rate ..and contribute a much larger share of overall taxes.” In 2008, Charlie Gibson questioned Candidate Obama about his desire to raise the capital gains tax. When Gibson reminded him the lower Capital Gains rates have proven in increase tax revenues, Obama replied, “What I’ve said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.” So we can see now that “the rich paying their fair share,” is simply code by the President for his promoting class warfare; jobs and the deficit be damned.

The Dogma of Progressive Science

If there is one thing that ties all progressives together it is dogma masquerading as science. As I mentioned in a previous article, Progressives; Still Lost in the 1920s the modern progressive movement began around the late 1800s/ early 1900’s when progressive believed that human and societal behavior could be understood and controlled through science. These behaviors spawned the social sciences of Eugenics, Psychiatry, Evolution and Communism; all four were considered to have a scientific base, even Communism was proposed by Marx and Engle’s, not as a form of government, but the eventual scientific destination of all successful societies. One of the basic scientific procedures when trying to prove a theory is to release your findings to the scientific world to see if your finding can be reproduced; this is called peer review. Another basic tenet of science is there must be a way of disproving your theory or the theory becomes non-scientific dogma. As time went on, the pseudo sciences of Keynesian economics and Man Made Global Warming joined the ranks.

Taken separately it is easy to understand that these were not science at all, taken together it is the progressives desire to eliminate God from the equation. Psychiatry as defined by Sigmund Freud held the Newtonian belief that once a psychosis was understood and identified then a cure or course of therapy was not far behind. Once Freud started to understand the true complexity of human behavior he realized his life’s worth has been more defining what psychology is not, more than what was. I have covered Eugenics in several of my articles, but stated simply it is racism, and elitism, proven through pseudo science with the goal of eliminating the useless eaters of the world. The fourth of the original pseudo sciences is the Theory of Evolution or the original title of Darwin’s theory, “The Origin of Species By Means of Natural Selection or Preservation of favored Races in the Struggle for Life.” It is not a big leap of faith to believe, even from just the title, that Darwin believed strongly in Eugenics, which he did.

The Theory of Evolution is still the sole and only scientific theory to challenge religious creation in the origins of life, even though it’s basic premise has never been scientifically proven. As most know the Theory of Evolution states that lower forms of animals evolved into higher forms of animals, and this occurred as animals adapted to their changing surroundings. This evolution was incremental and was the result of a genetic anomalies in animals the proved to be an life advantage, and the same species without this advantage would not be able to compete and would die off. This theory seemed to have been extrapolated from the common occurrences of adaptation, where a color of fur or resistance to a poison, helped a species become more viable. But these animals never morphed into an entirely different species, they simply adapted. Science has showed that similar species have similar genes and even identical strains of DNA, and that these strains of DNA seem to run through extinct and similar species, but no mid-species animals have ever been discovered. When confronted with this information, some of my progressive friends have said, okay so animals evolve in a single generation; which of course is something god could do, but by definition is not evolution.

I will not delve too much into Keynesian theory or Man Mad Global Warming , except to say both are a pseudo scientific, tied closely to progressive political beliefs and also have no avenue where they can be disproved. Those that espouse Man Made Global Warming, claim any and all weather conditions and changes are a result of Man Made Climate Change. Keynesians believe that if an economy does not recover after a stimulus has been injected into the economy, then the stimulus was not enough, with no ideal or maximum amount ever discussed.

So lets not be fooled by what always becomes the science of the oppressor. Science does not objectively become dogma and it takes a great deal of energy and financial considerations to keep this “scientific dogma” from coming crashing to the ground. Therefore, scientific dogma is always very easy to spot, as it will always exist to control and oppress people for the purposes of political or financial gain; or to simply control humanity as purpose unto itself.

Lord Monckton and the History of the Global Warming Scheme

Lord Monckton has no ax to grind but the truth. A self schooled mathematician he has taken on Man Made Global Warming and is quite possibly the most articulate and knowledgeable person on the subject on the planet. Having the ability to explain extremely complicated concepts in an very understandable manner, he was challenged to debate MMGW at the world famous Oxford Union, the world’s premier debating society and won. To this date Al Gore nor any other MMGW advocate will debate him on the subject. Below is an interview he did for infowars.com.