Mainstream Media Forced the Riddenhouse Narrative so Hard it Broke

In my last blog I showed how practically everything that was written by the mainstream media about the Riddenhouse trial was a lie. What has also become obvious is this was to force their white supremacy narrative for which they have few if any real examples to report on.

Here are some examples I posted earlier; "Riddenhouse is a white supremacist"; the truth is Riddenhouse is not associated with any groups at all, other than idolizing police officers. "Riddenhouse carried his AR-15 across state lines"; no Riddenhouse Ar-15 was bought for him by a friend who lives in Kenosha and was kept their by his friend (every lying account says he crossed state lines with his AR-15,  as if there was something wrong or illegal about it, but neither is true. The lie is likely looking for a nexus to a federal violation so the FBI and DOJ could charge Riddenhouse with a federal violation). "Riddenhouse was a vigilante"; no, Riddenhouse went to Kenosha to protect property and provide first aid to those who were injured in the rioting (prior to the shootings he was filmed discussing this very thing as he showed off his first-aid kit).

 Riddenhouse actually spent the previous day removing graffiti from a school in Kenosha. 

Probably the worst attempt to force the white supremacist narrative was several mainstream reports that Riddenhouse shot three black men, even though they were white; one was a child rapist, one had a history of domestic violence and the surviving subject was pointing a hand gun at Riddenhouse, when Riddenhouse shot him. 

There is also the fact "The riots were sparked by the officer-involved shooting of Jacob Blake, a black man. Blake is still alive, though everyone on the left thought he was dead. This was the first sign that liberal America has no clue what's going on." From Townhall.com 

There are also those playing the what if game. What if Riddenhouse had been black? Would the outcome had been the same? The left says no, but they reality is we don't know. First and foremost, race was simply not a fact in this case, but the left can't let it go. As my dad used to say, if the dog would not have stopped to shit it would have caught the rabbit; or would it have? Rabbits are fast and live in holes in the ground. What didn't happen, didn't happen; there numerous scenarios that could have played out from a murder conviction  to tha DA not even filing charges, but the outcome can never be known so the speculation is nothing more than race  baiting.

Finally we have a slew of elected Democrats villianizing Riddenhouse, calling him a white supremacist and vigilante, before any facts were known and even after he was found not guilty. President Biden is especially guilty of this, saying he was angry at the verdict even though he admitted not following the trial and refused to comment on his earlier and unsubstantiated accusation that Riddenhouse was a white supremacist. 

Fortunately, as a result of the press coverage of the verdict, at least the fact the subjects shot by Riddenhouse were white is becoming more common knowledge, and people are finally starting to question, how a white kid, shootings three white men is the act of a white supremacist.

The Blood From Kyle Riddenhouse Acquittal Riots On the Hands of the Lying Media

This post contains large parts of an article reposted by Bari Weiss. Since the post is available only to those that pay a fee, I can't link to it directly, but have included the title and a link to substack.

The Media's Verdict on Kyle RittenhouseWhy so many got this story so wrong.

https://substack.com/profile/2067309-bari-weiss

The left has sceamed to anyone that will listen, Kyle Riddenhouse is a "17 year old white supremacist domestic terrorist drove across state lines, armed with an AR 15. He shot and killed 2 people who had assembled to affirm the value, dignity, and worth of Black lives"; most of this is a complete fabrication. As shown below, the mainstream media lied and lied and lied and lied ... about what really happened.

"First, the idea that Kyle Rittenhouse was a white supremacist.

There was zero evidence that Rittenhouse was connected to white supremacist groups at the time of the shooting. He was a Trump supporter, yes, though he wasn’t old enough to vote. He was an admirer of police and firefighters, also true. He was a lifeguard. He’d been part of a “police explorer” program, and was also a firefighter/EMT cadet with the fire department in Antioch, Illinois, where he lived with his mom and two sisters.

That Rittenhouse had no connection to Kenosha.

In addition to having a job in Kenosha, Rittenhouse testified that much of his family lived there: his father, his grandma, his aunt and uncle, and his cousins. He also testified that on the morning of the shootings, he went downtown with his sister and friends to see the damage done by rioting the night before, and spent about two hours cleaning graffiti off of the local high school.

That Rittenhouse drove across state lines with a gun that night to oppose the protests.

This was a line that we heard constantly—never mind that Antioch, Illinois, is about 20 miles from Kenosha, Wisconsin. As the trial has shown, Kyle Rittenhouse did not travel to Kenosha to oppose protesters. He testified under oath that he had traveled to Kenosha for his job the night before the shootings, and was staying at a friend’s house. 

So what about the gun?

Rittenhouse didn’t bring the gun to Kenosha. The gun was purchased for Rittenhouse months earlier by a friend and stored in Kenosha at the home of that friend’s stepfather, as then-17-year-old Rittenhouse was too young to purchase it.

But it was illegal for him to even have the gun given that he wasn’t yet 18 years old, right?

That is not true. Under Wisconsin law, 17-year-olds are prohibited from carrying rifles only if they are short-barreled. The weapon Rittenhouse was carrying was not short-barreled. Which is why, during closing arguments, the court threw out the charge.

He was out there looking for a fight, and he got one: He killed two people and severely wounded a third.

Unless there’s evidence we haven’t seen, there’s no clear indication that Rittenhouse sought to kill anyone. What we know is that he showed up with a first aid kit and an AR-15-style rifle. Video evidence, and Rittenhouse’s own testimony, indicates that he offered medical assistance to protestors and ran with a fire extinguisher to try to put out fires—and that later, after being pursued, he killed two people, Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, and severely wounded a third. Both video evidence and the only living person that Rittenhouse shot that night, Gaige Grosskreutz, undermined the idea that Rittenhouse was simply an aggressor looking for a fight. During cross examination Grosskreutz acknowledged that Rittenhouse shot him only after Grosskreutz had pointed his own gun at Rittenhouse. Here’s how it went down:

Prosecutor: When you were standing three to five feet from him with your arms up in the air, he never fired, right?

Grosskreutz: Correct. 

Prosecutor: It wasn't until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him with your gun—now your hand’s down pointed at him—that he fired, right? 

Grosskreutz: Correct.

Had the people Rittenhouse shot, as Pressley claims, “assembled to affirm the value, dignity, and worth of Black lives”?

Watch this video of Joseph Rosenbaum and ask yourself if that is how you would describe this person:

Rosenbaum, 36, had spent years of his life in prison because he was a convicted sex offender. The morning he was killed, Rosenbaum was released from a Milwaukee hospital where he had been admitted after a suicide attempt. Ryan Balch, another witness for the prosecution, testified that Rosenbaum threatened both Balch and Rittenhouse saying, “If I catch you guys alone tonight, I’m gonna fucking kill you.”

The point is the left has a message and it will lie and destroy lives to try and push their agenda. So bad is their propaganda, they have resorted to callings blacks white supremacist if they do not parrot the world view of their self appointed old white Democrat masters; yes Democrat Jim Crow never died and is still alive with  the main street media and CRT that demands the return of segregation a the reason is the same as was voiced by the racist Southern Democrats; it's for their protection.

CRT Nuance Does Not Belong in K12

I recently watched a podcast were an elitist progressive countered a parent's argument regarding having a say in their child's education, by saying the parents don't understand  the nuance of being an educator. It made me think that there really is no, or should not be any nuance in K12 education. The children need to learn reading, writing, arithmetic, history and civics. Nuance only enters the picture when teachers try to interject indoctrination and social engineering. This of course is from the Democrats that have a history of racism that goes back to their inception. And all anyone has to do is read the racist statements President Biden has made throughout his career to know it has not stopped (when candidate  Obama first came on the scene Biden remarked  on how remarkable it was he has an articulate and clean black man; apparently viewing other black politicians as inarticulate  and dirty).  A good example is CRT, which is one of the most racist theories ever created. It reverses MLK Jr dream of a color blind society where people are judged by the content of their character,  to a hellish world where one is only judged by their identity and assuming all individuals  within any group all think the same and are constantly being assailed and subjugated by the white race. This goes along with the Democrat skewed version of identity politics, where minorities are defined not by the color of their skin, sex or sexual preference, but by their political worldview. As then candidate Joe Biden said, if you don't vote Democrat, you're not black. IOW, unless you kowtow to the old white Democrat elite, you can not even define yourself by your own skin color. The point being, in most ways, the Democrats only play identity politics if the person identifies as a Democrat, other wise they do not have the right to identify themselves by their sex, skin color sexual preference; you either kowtow with the Democrat elite or you are a white supremacist, regardless of your skin color (nothing brings out Democrat's blatant  racism than a black conservative; it is truly appalling to listen to such vile and naked hatred that the left has for blacks that don't kowtow to old white liberals thinking; its black liberalsthat are the true ventriloquist dummies. And this is what CRT teaches.

The Extreme Racsim of CRT and the Left

 Proverbs 24

30 I walked by the field of a lazy person,

the vineyard of one with no common sense.

31 I saw that it was overgrown with nettles.

It was covered with weeds,

and its walls were broken down.

32 Then, as I looked and thought about it,

I learned this lesson:

33 A little extra sleep, a little more slumber,

a little folding of the hands to rest—

34 then poverty will pounce on you like a bandit;

scarcity will attack you like an armed robber.

 

If one is to take CRT  (Critical Race Theory), as it is being taught in K-12, the question needs to be asked, what do the positive social behaviors of western culture with the accusations of“white-supremacy"; examples are showing up on time, the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) “worship of the written word,” “individualism” and “objectivity” "competence". "merit", "integration", equality,  and even "diversity". CRT is a race obsessive belief system, that started in US Law Schools, but quickly expanded into the humanities and is now being forced in public schools (K-12) that teaches racial hatred and  tribalism, where one's identity or tribe defines them, resulting in white supremacy and racial; one could actually say that CRT creates a white supremacy worldview where it did even exist before. And this is not even necessarily of social construct, but a result of your birth, or a birth right so to speak.   It also teaches that western culture has rigged society from it's inception in a way to keep the white race in power and  oppress minorities, specifically blacks. The idea that one can be born an oppressor is the same argument Hitler made about the Jews, so you have CRT and groups like antifa and BLM, embracing the most chilling aspect of NAZI fascism.

Much of this is warmed over Marxism Critical Theory where economic inequality, is replaced with racial oppressor vs the oppressed; in essence it's about giving up individual freedoms in the name of the security and fairness rabbit hole; IOW everyone be economically reduced to the lost common denominator with equal oppression. What has been added is the racism that has always been endemic in leftist intellectualism, specifically against blacks.. The fact is the left views blacks as inferior, so any argument of  equality of opportunity is moot in the mind of the left Intelligentsia. What is the point of a level playing field if one the of the teams is so inferior that are simply incapable of winning, regardless of any advantage or lack there of. If one looks at the history of western culture, there has always been a emphases on intelligence, aka cognitive ability. But if you are of the belief that blacks lack the cognitive ability of other races, than one could say, as does the left, that the deck is always been stacked against blacks even when equality of opportunity exists. BTW, I say blacks because the left has concentrated on the black race for the majority of their rhetoric (eg BLM) and it is the black race that is the primary victim of Democrat and left wing racism.

In many ways CRT is simply a hyper version of what has been called the soft racism from the left (BTW there is no such thing as soft racism, it is just as hard core racist as southern Democrat slavery). For years, Democrats in the US have insisted that blacks simply can not compete against whites, with or without a level playing field, hence affirmative action and black studies,  programs designed to circumvent the lack of preparedness for higher education, much of which is due the poor education and the lack of socialization of blacks in Democrat run cities. These government run ghettos, where gang warfare, rampant drug use, poverty,  and a lack of family structure, has lead to a lack of education and a predisposition towards the lack of personal responsibility, based on ones victim-hood. For decades blacks have been told they are not to blame for their anti-social behavior, yet their anti-social behavior is the primary barrier that stops blacks from becoming part of mainstream America and economic prosperity. This is true, even though the leadership demographics of these run these cities, are almost always a large black majority, yet the social justice warriors of CRT blames the oppression of  blacks is the result of them having been excluded from positions responsibility and power. This history of the destruction of the black family and culture due to the lefts belief in black inferiority was well documented by Lawrence Soloman   Systemic Racism Exists

So what does CRT offer? The answer is chilling; social disintegration and racial hatred in the name of fairness. The end game is of course Communism; make western culture the scapegoat of the fact that life lacks fairness, lie about the fact that blacks are excluded from power and decision making and offer up totalitarian forced equality (aka equity) as the answer. In other words fairness at all costs, even if it destroys the free world and makes everyone hate each other to do it. But even worse, by creating the myth that one can be born racist solely on ones identity,  CRT  teaches children how to be racists, instilling in them something akin to racial hatred in the name of indoctrination toward a political belief system that has always been based on lies. "They knew what they were doing was a lie. I knew what they were doing was a lie. Everybody here knows what they were doing is a lie. They know that we know they’re lying and yet they continue to lie and they lied and they lied and they lied." If the 20th century taught us anything it is the end result of totalitarian utopia is worse than death, it is living hell

Founders of Black Lives Matters Are Trained Marxists

Many have questioned the intentions of Black Lives Matter, as they seem to ignore the thousands of black men, women and children, killed in Democrat run cities, and focus only on the relatively few blacks killed by the police. The reason is simple, as described by Don Lemon of CNN, BLM focuses is mainly anti-police and not on black-on-black crime. In other words Black Lives Matter is simply the name they go buy, not their focus. Further they are admitted Marxists; in a newly surfaced video co-founder Patrisse Cullors says she, and the other co-founder Alicia Garza, are trained Marxist. BLM Co-founder Describes Herself as Trained Marxist I has also been revealed, Cullors was mentored/trained by Eric Mann, who like Bill Aires, was a member of the 1960s violent Marxist group, the Weather Underground. So BLM is less a civil rights group and more a political organization intent on overthrowing the US Constitution, by any means necessary.

BLM Revolution; but if you want money for minds that hate...

First let me say you are most likely not a white supremacist, neither are you likely a racist (your would likely know if you were). Both these have caused a problem for those that make a living maintaining Black victim-hood status. So these race baiters have declared whites are born racist, main stream America is systemically racist, so the only answer is to "defund" police department so they are free to end the American experiment of self rule through rioting and wide unabated criminal activity to frighten the American citizenry in to allowing them to put in it's place an oppressive Marxist regime.   

In Seattle they are now teaching white participants that  "objectivity," "individualism," "intellectualization," and "comfort" are all vestiges of internalized racial oppression. To “let go” of “comfort,” “guaranteed physical safety,” “control over the land,” “social status,” and “relationships with some other white people.” In other words, to expunge your internal racism you must never use discernment, you must never think for yourself (to think for yourself is the ultimate crime against Marxism) or intellectualize anything, or even have white friends. Further they say that wanting to feel comfort and being safety in your home means you are a white supremacist. This is ridiculously absurd but it does fall in line with classic Marxist indoctrination. Just like Winston Smith in 1984, victory for BLM Marxism is to breakdown a persons will and psyche, so they accept everything told to them by the powers that be,  especially if it is not grounded in truth or reality; the more ridiculous the better. The only thing that matters to Marxist is total control of the individual; hence the term totalitarian.  And it doesn't matter, what any white person does to be accountable to BLM, it will never be acceptable or enough. (Let me repeat this so it's perfectly clear, there is no way a white person can redeem themselves to BLM, any action or actions will always be seen as futile because collectivism needs an unrepentant enemy of the people to take hold). It would be no different than a sociopathic killer telling their victim they can beg for their lives if they want to; you are expected expected to beg for forgiveness, even though you know it will fail. And you will gladly do it because it is a mandate of the Marxist moral state which you should joyfully follow.

In the Black community you often hear about who is down for the struggle and who is an Uncle Tom for being successful by joining main stream America; the truth is that in today's main stream America blacks are welcomed with open arms . But what becomes very obvious is there is simply no path to success if you follow the down for the struggle credo. White Privilege is just another excuse in a long list of excuses why Blacks have not succeeded. The major flaw in this excuse is the blacks that do join main stream America tend to be very successful; you know the Uncle Toms, and while Blacks do experience some racism, it certainly is not pervasive or systematic. Many Blacks that live in Democrat ghettos, have Black mayors, Black police chiefs, Black assembly and council members and Black business owners. And since many Blacks in the ghettos refuse to leave the ghettos (being down with the struggle) and join what they call white main stream America. So White Privilege becomes more about something they hear about, as they rarely place themselves in a situation where, if White Privilege existed,  they would experience it.  The reason Blacks live in such poverty, in city ghettos with rampant crime, poor education, violent street gangs and broken families is because they have voted and relied on Democrats for the last 50 years. So the issues facing the Black community is not White Privilege, is is Democrat neglect.

The very belief that a single race shares a single belief is a racist (and absurd) unto itself. But such a belief system goes hand and hand with the Democrat racist worldview of identity politics, that professes all races have only one collective world view. This is s form of reverse Eugenics (Eugenics a form of rabid white supremacy embraced by Democrats in the late 19th century, that was praised by Planned Parenthood's Margarete Sanger and Hitler himself), that has been spelled out by Black Liberation Theology, embraced the rabidly antisemitic Louis Farrakhan, and President Obama's long time mentor, Rev Jeremiah Wright.  Therefore, BLM and the Democrats have seemingly aligned themselves with such an identity racist worldview, that one race is responsible for all the unfairness in the world.

As I pointed out before, Black Lives Matter is not a civil rights group, they are a hate group with a political agenda. The fact that thousands of young  men are being murdered is not their concern; their name notwithstanding. Their sole propose is to disrupt the country to make way for a Marxist regime. Their new catch word is white supremacy; 250 years since the Declaration of Independence, and 165 years after 600,000 Americans died in a civil war to end slavery, and 4 years since the first black President was elected, but now BLM decides the founding fathers were white supremacists, as are all whites today; and denying you are a white supremacist is absolute proof you are a white supremacist (This is truly a conundrum, since BLM tells us all whites are white supremacists, how can one be more of a white supremacists if they deny they are?) Of course none of this is supposed to make any sense anyway.

BLM Is Only Their Name

There is a lot of confusion about Black Lives Matter. The reason is obvious, with a name like BLM, one would naturally assume the organization purpose is to stop the taking of black lives; and you would be wrong. BLM is not a civil rights organization, they do nothing to help anyine, they are a political organization, BLM is just their name;in other words a marketing ploy. BLM is an anti-police, anti-America, pro-Marxists, and more in line with pro-Marxist terrorists groups like Antifa that use violence to achieve their end of a mythical Marxist utopia, that historically has led to mass graves. This is why BLM does not respond to questions about the thousands of blacks killed in Democrat controlled cities, as it does not forward their Marxist agenda; IOW black on black murder is not their issue, as the only black lives that matter to them are those associated with police contacts they can use to protest, riot, and show their disdain for America.

What BLM does do is capitalize on their continual claims of systemic racism aka white privilege. To prove such an non-issue they use the tried and true Democrat fallacy that correlation proves causation; IOW if a higher percentage of blacks are involved in the criminal justice system, it proves the criminal Justice system is racist. Never mind a high percentage of blacks live in Democrat ghettos with poor education, pandemic gang violence, drug use and of course poverty. Another issue that has been pointed out is most blacks children do not live in a stable home environment, where fathers are often not present. This is an issue for BLM but it's not what you think. Rather than encourage families to stay together, they disdain the concept of family. This is of course consistent with Marxist doctrine that says your children belong to the state and need to be taken from you at an early age to be indoctrinated as not to allow their minds being polluted with concepts of individual rights and freedom, over collective oppression (remember their is no such thing as collective rights, only government tyranny). 

As I discussed before, Americans have not been very receptive to Marxism, so instead BLM is using racism as the excuse to tear down America and replace it with a government controlled socialist state. Interestingly enough the likes of  Rep. Ilhan Omar,  Minnesota Democrat has claimed America is a “system of oppression (eg Capitalism)” in all sectors and must be torn down; her answer on the other hand, is the horribly oppressive system of Marxism with it's dehumanizing collective forced equality. One of the most obvious tactics is the attempt to stifle the free speech; they actually believe in the Marxist concept that speech they don't agree with should be treated as a physical assault, and to push their agenda accusing anyone that doesn't agree with their Marxist worldview as racist and has convinced corporate America to kowtow to their demands as they seek to destroy anyone taht dares exercise any free speech against them.  It's doubtful this will work, but the damage that will be done to the country will take decades to repair, and by using racism to try and forward their agenda, and will set race relations back 50 years.